Search/Product # Look up

| Author: AtCor Medical |
| Article Date: 6/21/2010 |

Noninvasive Central Blood Pressure Measurement: Changing diagnosis, drug therapy management—and patient lifestyles
In physician practices throughout the country, a new method of assessing cardiovascular risk and managing hypertension therapy is being adopted, using the SphygmoCor® system from AtCor Medical, which allows physicians to determine pressures in the ascending aorta through a measurement taken at the patient’s wrist.

Photo caption: Determining the pressure the heart, brain and kidneys actually experience
The SphygmoCor technology, which received FDA marketing clearance in 2002 after demonstrating substantial equivalence to invasive arterial monitoring catheters, has been featured in over 600 peer-reviewed, published studies.
SphygmoCor is used globally in leading healthcare institutions, including all of the 21 hospitals on the US News & World Reports “Best Hospitals” 2010 Honor Roll, and in leading physician practices and pharmaceutical clinical trials.
In current clinical practice, noninvasive central blood pressure assessment is used to make treatment decisions for patients with high normal brachial blood pressure and resistant hypertensives and to assess the effects of hypertension medications, which can affect central and brachial blood pressures differently.
A recently published article in Mayo Clinical Proceedings describes the benefits of noninvasive central blood pressure assessment as an adjunct to brachial blood pressure measurement: in initiating and monitoring hypertensive treatment, in observing the hemodynamic effects of atherosclerotic risk factors and in predicting cardiovascular outcomes and events.
“First, central aortic pressure is a better predictor of cardiovascular outcome than peripheral pressure. Second, peripherally obtained blood pressure does not accurately reflect central pressure because of pressure amplification. Lastly, antihypertensive medications have differing effects on central pressures, despite similar reductions in brachial blood pressure.”
Mayo Clin Proc. 2010;85 (5): 460-472
The Mayo Clinic has also released an eight minute video on youtube.com, narrated by Jan Stepanek MD, one of the authors of the journal article. The video demonstrates how the SphygmoCor system is used in the Clinic and presents case studies showing how test results are used to improve patient management.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OOK6T7tCUS4&feature=youtube_gdata
(Click to view video)
A measurement at the wrist derives pressure in the ascending aorta
The SphygmoCor system, which is connected to a laptop computer, uses applanation tonometry to capture the arterial pressure wave form at the radical artery. After competing brachial cuff blood pressure measurement, the technician finds the strongest pulse point at the radial artery and records ten seconds of radial pressure waves. The SphygmoCor system instantly derives the central pressure wave forms and indices and displays both radial and central pressure results on the screen.

Displays the patient’s arterial age
Reports generated by the SphygmoCor system display patient demographic data, test quality control criteria and key indices of central pressure. Patient results are also graphed on an age reference scale which compares individual results with a data base of “normals” of the same gender.
SphygmoCor central pressures and reference age data allow physicians and patients to assess the beneficial effects of drug therapy and lifestyle changes in subsequent testing.
The printable patient reports are a powerful motivator and compliance tool.

New Version 9 Software: Ease of Use
At the American College of Cardiology 2010 Annual Meeting, AtCor introduced SphygmoCor Version 9 with AutoCapture, a new feature designed to make the system easy for practices to use. During testing, the system automatically captures test results, once acceptable data has been recorded.
The Version 9 system also features re-designed clinical reports for efficient data interpretation, flagging patient results that may indicate increased risk.
Web-based Central Pressures CME Program
The Vascular Biology Working Group (VBWG) offers a complimentary web-based CME program on the emerging role of noninvasive central blood pressure in clinical practices. The program includes a review of the NIH funded Strong Health Study, which found that when central pulse pressure exceeds 50 mm, Hg the risk of cardiovascular events sharply increases.
(Click to access CME Program)
http://www.vbwgcme.org/program.aspx?cmeid=1128&lname=ALERT
For more information about the SphygmoCor system:
AtCor Medical
One Pierce Place Suite 295-East
Itasca IL 60143
Telephone: 630-228-8871
E-mail: info@atcormedical.com
Company web site: www.atcormedical.com
Boutouyrie P, et. al. Amlodipine-Valsartan Combination Decreases Central Systolic Blood Pressure More Effectively Than the Amlodipine-Atenolol Combination. The EXPLOR Study. Hypertension. 2010 Apr 19.
Roman MJ, et. al. Relations of central and brachial blood pressure to left ventricular hypertrophy and geometry: the Strong Heart Study. J Hypertens. 2010 Feb;28(2):384-8.
Denardo SJ, et. al. Pulse wave analysis of the aortic pressure waveform in severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Circ Heart Fail. 2010 Jan;3(1):149-56. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
Roman MJ, et. al. High Central Pulse Pressure is Associated With Adverse Cardiovascular Outcome: The Strong Heart Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:1730-1734.
Avolio AP, et. al. Role of pulse pressure amplification in arterial hypertension: experts’ opinion and review of the data. Hypertension. 2009 Aug;54(2):375-83. Epub 2009 Jun 29.
Mackenzie IS, et. al. Comparison of the Effects of Antihypertensive Agents on Central Blood Pressure and Arterial Stiffness in Isolated Systolic Hypertension. Hypertension. 2009 Aug ;54(2):409-13. Epub 2009 June 1.
Protogerou AD, et. al. The effect of antihypertensive drugs on central blood pressure beyond peripheral blood pressure. Part I: (Patho)-physiology, rationale and perspective on pulse pressure amplification. Curr Pharm Des. 2009;15(3):267-71.
Khalil A, et. al. Antihypertensive therapy and central hemodynamics in wormen with hypertensive discorders in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;113(3):646-54.
Heffernan KS, et. al. Racial differences in central blood pressure and vascular funcation in young men. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2008 Dec;295(6):H2380-7. Epub 2008 Oct 10.
Sharman J, et. al. Central blood pressure measurement may improve risk stratification. J Hum Hypertens. 2008 Dec;22(12):838-44. Epub 2008 Jul 3.
McEniery CM, et. al. Central Pressure : Variability and Impact of Cardiovascular Risk Factors. The Anglo-Cardiff Collaborative Trial II. Hypertension. 2008;51:1-7.
Pini R, et. al. Central But Not Brachial Blood Pressure Predicts Cardiovascular Events in an Unselected Geriatric Population. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:2432-9.
Nichols WW, et. al. Effects of arterial stiffness, pulse wave velocity, and wave reflections on the central aortic pressure waveform. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008 Apr; 10(4):295-303.
O’Rourke MF, et. al. Basis for use of central blood pressure measurement in office clinical practice. Journal of the American Society of Hypertension. Jan 2008; 2(1) 28-38.
Roman MJ, et. al. Central Pressure More Strongly Relates to Vascular Disease and Outcome Than Does Brachial Pressure; The Strong Heart Study. Hypertension. 2007 Jul;50:197-203. Epub 2007 May 7.
Laurent S, et. al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 2006 Nov; 27(21):2588-605.
Williams B, et. al. Differential Impact of Blood Pressure-Lowering Drugs on Central Aortic Pressure and Clinical Outcomes. Principal results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) Study.
Circulation. 2006;113:1213-1225.
McEniery CM, et. al. Normal vascular aging: differential effects on wave reflection and aortic pulse wave velocity: the Anglo-Cardiff Collaborative Trial (ACCT). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005; Nov 1; 46(9):1753-60.
Izzo Jr.,J. Pulse contour analysis and augmentation index: It’s time to move beyond cuff blood pressure measurement. Am J Hypertens 2005 Jan;18(1 Pt 2):1S-2S.